NSA chief Rogers & DNI Coats stonewall Senate Intel hearing on Trump

National Security Agency Director Michael Rogers and Director of National Intelligence Dan Coats are testifying before the US Senate Intelligence Committee today about Donald Trump’s efforts to influence the FBI’s Russia probe.

In their testimony, Rogers and Coats are doing an awfully good job of not answering the Senators’ questions — even the GOP members who are trying to get Trump off the hook.

Senators are trying to find out what Donald Trump asked Rogers and Coats about the Russia probe. Specifically, Trump reportedly asked both men to publicly deny that there was evidence showing the Trump campaign colluded with the Russians, and Coats was further asked to ask the FBI to drop its probe of Michael Flynn.

When asked about this today, Rogers responded that he never felt “pressured” by Trump, and that he doesn’t believe he was ever asked to do anything “illegal.” Which wasn’t the question. The question is “what did Trump ask you to do,” not “did you feel pressured or did you feel it was illegal.”

When Rogers was pressed on what Trump actually asked him to do, Rogers responded that he’d already answered the question, which he hadn’t.

Coats gave the same non-answer, nearly verbatim, which makes one wonder whether they were coached and/or colluded on their testimony.

red-donateWith the election of Donald Trump, AMERICAblog’s independent journalism and activism is more needed than ever.

Please support our work with a generous donation. (If you prefer PayPal, use this link.) We don’t make much on advertising, we need your support to continue our work. Thanks.

And buy a t-shirt and support our work:

nevertheless she persisted


All the proceeds go to supporting our independent journalism at AMERICAblog.

Follow me on Twitter & Facebook:

CyberDisobedience on Substack | @aravosis | Facebook | Instagram | LinkedIn. John Aravosis is the Executive Editor of AMERICAblog, which he founded in 2004. He has a joint law degree (JD) and masters in Foreign Service from Georgetown; and has worked in the US Senate, World Bank, Children's Defense Fund, the United Nations Development Programme, and as a stringer for the Economist. He is a frequent TV pundit, having appeared on the O'Reilly Factor, Hardball, World News Tonight, Nightline, AM Joy & Reliable Sources, among others. John lives in Washington, DC. .

Share This Post

6 Responses to “NSA chief Rogers & DNI Coats stonewall Senate Intel hearing on Trump”

  1. Jim Arndt says:

    That is not his call to make. To quote the great Jack Webb, “Just the facts ma’am.”

  2. woodroad34 says:

    Sorry, the only one spinning it is you. As Laurence Tribe (Harvard Law Professor specializing in Constitutional Law) put it: “@SenAngusKing pressed brilliantly on the unexplained refusals to answer clearly pertinent questions. This is contempt in all but name.”

  3. Annsragsdale says:

    Google is paying 97$ per hour! Work for few hours and have longer with friends & family! !mj193d:
    On tuesday I got a great new Land Rover Range Rover from having earned $8752 this last four weeks.. Its the most-financialy rewarding I’ve had.. It sounds unbelievable but you wont forgive yourself if you don’t check it
    ➽➽;➽➽ http://GoogleFinancialJobsCash193ShopWorldPay$97Hour ★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★✫★★:::::!mj193d..,..

  4. Badgerite says:

    Hardly. Even asking is obstruction. The intent is for others in position of power to discredit the Russia investigation and thereby give trump cover to shut it down. That just friggin screams guilty. As is the fact that trump subsequently fired Comey in order to end the investigation of his campaign’s collusion with Russia. He has already stated publicly that that was the real reason for the firing. If you are willing to fire the FBI Director to shut down an investigation into your own or your associates actions, that is obstruction. Period.
    That would be the ultimate “pressure” wouldn’t it.

  5. MoonDragon says:

    Or that the attempt was inept.

  6. Jackson says:

    “No pressure to influence the investigation” means no obstruction, gentlemen. MSM and Trump Haters can spin otherwise, of course.

© 2021 AMERICAblog Media, LLC. All rights reserved. · Entries RSS