Another GOP Congressman admits the Benghazi Committee was set up to attack Hillary

Speaking on a radio program in upstate New York yesterday, Republican Congressman Richard Hanna reiterated Kevin McCarthy’s admission that the House Select Committee on Benghazi is a government-funded opposition research firm designed to raise Hillary Clinton’s unfavorables and bring down her poll numbers.

Here’s the audio, via ThinkProgress (start at 9:45):

[iframe width=”100%” height=”166″ scrolling=”no” frameborder=”no” src=”″]

As Hanna said:

Sometimes the biggest sin you can commit in D.C. is to tell the truth…This may not be politically correct, but I think that there was a big part of this investigation that was designed to go after people and an individual, Hillary Clinton.

After what Kevin McCarthy said, it’s difficult to accept at least a part of it was not [political]…I think that’s the way Washington works. But you’d like to expect more from a committee that’s spent millions of dollars and tons of time.

Hillary Clinton talks to Ron Johnson Benghazi

Hillary Clinton talks to Ron Johnson about Benghazi.

Hanna’s admission, coupled with the allegations from former committee staffer Bradley Podliska that he was fired for not being eager enough to use his role as an investigator politically, are black marks on the committee’s upcoming hearings on October 22nd, which will feature testimony from Hillary Clinton. She was already comfortable going on the offensive during Tuesday night’s debate regarding the Benghazi committee, quipping that “this committee is basically an arm of the Republican National Committee.” While Democrats have been saying this ever since the committee’s inception, Republican corroboration legitimizes the claim for the general public.

I wouldn’t be surprised if we see a few more Republican members of Congress suggest in the coming days that they agree with Hanna. Now that McCarthy’s broken the first rule of Benghazi club (you don’t talk about Benghazi club), he’s cleared the way for others to follow suit. Hanna doesn’t get asked about the politicization of Benghazi — nor does he give the answer he does — had McCarthy not paved the way. But he can’t be the only Republican who doesn’t seriously believe that the Benghazi committee is, at this point, solely focused on finding justice for American victims of a terror attack.

So, who’s next?

Jon Green graduated from Kenyon College with a B.A. in Political Science and high honors in Political Cognition. He worked as a field organizer for Congressman Tom Perriello in 2010 and a Regional Field Director for President Obama's re-election campaign in 2012. Jon writes on a number of topics, but pays especially close attention to elections, religion and political cognition. Follow him on Twitter at @_Jon_Green, and on Google+. .

Share This Post

6 Responses to “Another GOP Congressman admits the Benghazi Committee was set up to attack Hillary”

  1. Work @ Home Jobs2015 says:

    my collaborator’s stride mother makes $97/hr on the web…….…..Last weekend I Bought A Brand new McLaren F1 after earning 18,512$,this was my last month’s paycheck ,and-a little over, $17k last-month .No-doubt about it, this really is the most comfortable work I have ever had . I began this 8-months ago and pretty much immediately was bringing home at least $97, p/h….Learn More right Here.
    ➤➤➤ http://www.GoogleFinancialIncomeSupportHomeBasedProJobs/Get/$97hourly… ❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦❦

  2. nicho says:

    And it’s interesting that every time there’s a mass shooting, the Republicans are the first ones to start preaching that we “shouldn’t politicize a tragedy,” which is just what they’re doing with Benghazi.

  3. LoveCoates says:

    So that’s makes three Republicans – Rep. McCathy, Rep. Hanna, and the fired Benghazi staffer == who now admit millions of taxpayer dollars are being spent on a fake, made=up scandal, which is both illegal and unethical.

    Democrats should sue House Republicans for their illegal abuse of public money and the public trust. Rethuglicans are liars and cannot be trusted. Using the tragic deaths in Benghazi for crass political purposes is disgusting.

  4. Bill_Perdue says:

    The only relevant question has nothing to do with campaign lies by both parties, rather it’s about their reactionary role in promoting wars of aggression.

    Libya was a demonstration attack by the US and NATO meant to punish the Arab Spring and discourage its spread. As they did in Iran, Iraq, Palestine, Egypt, Bahrain, Syria and elsewhere the US and NATO allied themselves with right wing forces either to cement the power of a right wing dictatorships, as they did in Bahrain and Egypt, or to get rid of secular governments and replace them with hard right islamist dictatorships, as they did in Iraq and Libya and are trying to do in Syria and Yemen.

  5. mf_roe says:

    It’s not like they are ashamed after all. They welcome the chance to brag on themselves.

  6. Houndentenor says:

    Nothing we didn’t all already know, but confirmation is always good.

© 2020 AMERICAblog Media, LLC. All rights reserved. · Entries RSS