Scott Walker proves his foreign policy manhood by going to more countries than his opponents

When it comes to proving his conservative bona fides, Scott Walker has his domestic bases covered. None of the other Republican candidates have busted as many unions or cut as many education dollars or broken as many budgets as the current governor of Wisconsin. Walker is, hands down, the presidential candidate most qualified to serve the donor class. After all, he’s already gotten the Kochs’ stamp of approval and he hasn’t even (officially) announced he’s running yet.

But with the economy recovering and the rest of the world being, as Ted Cruz would say, “on fire,” 2016 is shaping up to be a foreign policy election. What does Walker, a former state senator in and current governor of a midwestern state, have to say about global affairs? And why should we pay attention?

That was, in effect, the question posed to Walker by Bob Schieffer on CBS’s Face the Nation yesterday. And while Walker didn’t compare unions to the Islamic State, as he did at CPAC earlier this year, his answer was more empty than offensive this time around.

Watch below, via RawStory:

Walker’s answer started off well enough. He made the obligatory homage to Reagan — America’s greatest dead living president — before suggesting that “experience” is just one of those fancy words that the press uses to delegitimize true leaders, who don’t need to know much about a country to know that America can and will put a boot in its ass:

As a governor, it’s really ultimately about leadership. To me, in my lifetime, one of the best presidents when it comes to foreign policy was a governor from California. In my lifetime, one of the worst presidents when it comes to foreign policy was a freshman senator from Illinois. So I think it’s not just about past experiences; it’s about leadership.

Of course, that governor of California illegally sold arms to a country that was officially designated as a state sponsor of terrorism, and then used those funds to illegally support an anti-democratic revolution in a foreign country. But being a good president isn’t about knowing anything about the experiences of the past; it’s about having the leadership necessary to forget the past.

In any case, Walker then went on to argue that it doesn’t matter if he personally knows anything about foreign policy, because that’s what other, smarter people are for:

Scott Walker, via Gil C /

Scott Walker, via Gil C /

As a governor, you have to to put a cabinet in place, and hopefully you pick people as smart or smarter than you on any given topic. I think that’s something that’s required of a successful president, putting people in place — be it Secretary of Defense, National Security Advisors, Secretary of State and others — and then having the good sense to listen to them and to others in the chain of command and the military, consulting with the Congress. All those sorts of things I think are important of a president. And I think successful governors — in either party — have to do that every single day: consult with people in their cabinet and act.

To be fair, Walker isn’t wrong here. Presidents need to hire good people and delegate effectively. However, that has absolutely nothing to do with Walker’s previous foreign policy experience, and if anything admits to listeners that there’s a serious lack thereof. At this point, we’re about 90 seconds into what would amount to an 110-second answer and we still haven’t heard anything about Walker’s foreign policy experience. But not to worry, Walker finally got around to laying out his credentials by the end of his answer:

Beyond that…as a governor, I’ve been to, just recently in Germany and Spain and France. Earlier in year went to the United Kingdom on trade-related missions. A few years back in China and Japan, so that’s probably the most that any governor of either party has is that experience in terms of trade relations.

There you have it: Scott Walker has more foreign policy experience than his opponents because he has more foreign experience than his opponents. Beyond the six countries he mentioned in his answer, Walker also just got back from his Republican Birthright trip to Israel, courtesy of Sheldon Adelson, and he can probably see Canada from his house. So that makes eight countries that he’s visited. That’s probably at least five countries more qualified than Rick Perry, right?

Stepping on foreign soil does not a global citizen make. And of course, if Walker really wants to go there, and reduce foreign policy expertise to a country-counting dick-measuring contest, Hillary Clinton would be more than happy to oblige.

Jon Green graduated from Kenyon College with a B.A. in Political Science and high honors in Political Cognition. He worked as a field organizer for Congressman Tom Perriello in 2010 and a Regional Field Director for President Obama's re-election campaign in 2012. Jon writes on a number of topics, but pays especially close attention to elections, religion and political cognition. Follow him on Twitter at @_Jon_Green, and on Google+. .

Share This Post

16 Responses to “Scott Walker proves his foreign policy manhood by going to more countries than his opponents”

  1. nichole.davi says:

    %&&%check this out –> Just Click Here to SEe <—

  2. Naja pallida says:

    All the Republican candidates seem to think that saber rattling is all that is required for a foreign policy. They’re a one trick pony, that needs to be sent to the glue factory.

  3. KristineRWeber says:

    ♛★☆ I AM MAKING 99USD PER [email protected]//



  4. Andy Taylor says:

    ✺♪✈ Just i got a Draft 13000 usd …. Start work offered by Google!!Yes,this is definitely the most financially rewarding Job I’ve had . Last Monday I bought a great Lotus Elan after I been earning $9534 this-last/5 weeks and-a little over, $10k last month . . I started this four months/ago and immediately started to bring home minimum $97 per/hr … I worked here ->

    You can Make It Easily…..

    Just see here….check it,.,.,,.

    ➧➧ http://www.Yourdreamcomestrue.C0m…….

  5. mirth says:

    I agree that he acted the role pretty well. Even when Nancy had to whisper the answers his porous brain couldn’t make sense of, he still managed that genial aw-shucks smile.

  6. mirth says:

    On the current prez run subject, this from the Harvard Political Review:

    Why Not Martin O’Malley?

  7. FLL says:

    So when is Scott Walker going to join the same pro-U.S.-Iran-war echo chamber that the other have? (Link here to my comment on previous thread.) It’s only a matter of time until Walker makes the same jackass out of himself concerning the past Iraq War that the other Republican presidential candidates have, and it’s only a matter of time until Walker makes the same jackass out of himself concerning a future Iran War that the Republicans in the U.S. Senate (and John McCain and Mitt Romney) have. Good luck with that.

  8. Indigo says:

    A good president? I would never say that. He was a figure head, an actor hired to play the role of president from a script written by his handlers. He was convincing, as actors go.

  9. Indigo says:

    All that and one more thing, he isn’t capable of being president of all the people. He’s another one of these exclusionary types that want to use the government to exclude people. He’d be happy in Kansas where they are careful to be certain that people on food stamps can’t use their discretion because the Fat Cats know what’s best for the poor. That whole Litter Box of Fat Cats are trashy!

  10. Indigo says:

    Reagan was experienced. He was a B movie actor with some TV credits, a former president of the Screen Actors Guild, and his 8 year role at the White House was entirely credible. Many people believed he was in charge. That deserves if not an Oscar, at least a Golden Globe nod.

  11. 2karmanot says:

    Madison is the Ann Arbor of Wisconsin.

  12. Zorba says:

    Oh dear, Fixer. You live in Wisconsin and have had to put up with this ego-driven psycho? I’m sorry, although there are a lot of nice reasons to live in Wisconsin. It does have an excellent state university system (if Walker hasn’t trashed it) and a particularly highly ranked medical school. Madison is a great city. (And there is the cheese, don’t forget the cheese!) Many other good reasons, as well.
    I think that your attitude of “better to lose one state…..than an entire country” is very magnanimous, and wise.
    LaFollette must be turning over in his grave.

  13. FLL says:

    I’m originally from Chicago, but Madison was always my fave place in the Midwest. Bet they don’t like Walker much in Madison, Wisconsin.

  14. The_Fixer says:

    Foreign policy requires a light touch and subtlety. These are two things that Scott Walker does not possess.

    If he gets elected, it will be a rerun of the G.W. Bush presidency. He’s about as smart, is a sociopath and thinks that he’s right on everything. This, in spite of the fact that he has no such experience, and set aside all that book learnin’ you do in college.

    At the risk of him staying in Wisconsin and further screwing things up here, I certainly hope he doesn’t get elected president. Better to lose one state to idiotic mismanagement than an entire country.

  15. 2karmanot says:

    “But being a good president isn’t about knowing anything about the experiences of the past;” Walker only has a high school degree, no college. He certainly qualifies in the not knowing anything about the past category.

  16. nicho says:

    Any time anyone tries to tell me that Reagan was a good president, never mind a great one, I pretty much stop listening to them. They’re full of shit and not worth my time.

© 2021 AMERICAblog Media, LLC. All rights reserved. · Entries RSS