Credit Suisse profits plummet 24%, cuts 2,300 jobs, then gives CEO & chairman 33% raise

Only in the world of big finance could this possibly make sense. What other industry rewards corporate leadership for failing in such a big way? The profits for Credit Suisse dropped a massive 24% last year, and their stock was mostly flat, yet they still handed out a fat 33% bonus to both their CEO and Chairman.

Who do you have to kill in this industry not to get a raise?

According to the bank’s compensation committee, this special bonus was because the CEO was “positioning the firm for the future.”  But instead of actually waiting for that future success, they rewarded him now. It would make a lot more sense (and be more in line with industry standards) to reward the CEO for actual success, but in today’s banking world, nothing is normal.

UBS, another bank bailed out by the Swiss government, was also in the new last week for giving its CEO $9 million last year, and offering another $26 million “welcome package” to the new head of its investment banking division. Nothing saying “welcome” to a taxpayer bailout than $26 million for one guy.

rich guy 1% cnbc bankers wall street

Rich guy via Shutterstock

Keep in mind that Switzerland just passed a new law that will provide shareholders a vote on executive pay, and there will also be limits on such pay. The decision to provide a bonus to a failing CEO has to be viewed in that context.

Also remember that the banking industry has been actively working to get around increased taxes on banker pay, including in the UK this year when the Wall Street darling, Goldman Sachs delayed bonuses for a while in order to get around paying taxes on them.

And it’s not entirely clear just how much money these banks actually have to keep throwing at their top executives.  We had reported the other day that the too-big-to-fail banks were getting an annual subsidy equal to their profits.  Then in a follow-up, we wrote about a new analysis showing the subsidy may be nearly ten times that amount, equal to the entire amount of the stimulus.  Generally, speaking, this is not an industry in which you have money to burn. Strike that — this is not an industry in which you should have money to burn. But burn they do.

I reported last month on the chairman of the Royal Bank of Scotland, whose $2 million a year salary and potential $9 million bonus is being sold to the public as “modest.”  I guess in those circles, it is.  Then again, modesty isn’t exactly this industry’s forté.  Remember when AIG, after it’s $182 billion bailout threatened to sue the US government because the bailout that saved them was “too onerous.”  How onerous would shutting down have been?

Then there was the $400 million taxpayer funded bonus in the UK. Here’s what I wrote about that last month:

In this case, the Royal Bank of Scotland, which is 82% owned by the state, plans to dish out nearly $400 million in bonuses to the very staff who are implicated in the bank owing a nearly $800 million fine for its role in the Libar-rigging scandal.  But the bank is state-owned, so the taxpayers are paying for both the fine, and the bonuses to the people who may be responsible for the bank being fined.

While the political class has made some minor attempts to curb the excesses of the banking industry, the banks have easily stayed one step ahead of these reforms, while thumbing their noses at everyone who saved them.

In other words, it’s just another day in the sleazy world of banking.  As Elizabeth Warren warned us at the Democratic convention last summer, “the system is rigged.”

I was going to end the post with Elizabeth Warren’s wonderful speech. But let’s instead close with Tom Brokaw’s great takedown of the big banks right after the November elections. It’s only 30 seconds long, and spot on.

An American in Paris, France. BA in History & Political Science from Ohio State. Provided consulting services to US software startups, launching new business overseas that have both IPO’d and sold to well-known global software companies. Currently launching a new cloud-based startup. Full bio here.

Share This Post

9 Responses to “Credit Suisse profits plummet 24%, cuts 2,300 jobs, then gives CEO & chairman 33% raise”

  1. RepubAnon says:

    Or a reversion to pre-communist revolution behavior. Watch what happens if the robber barons perceive a serious threat from the worker bees that isn’t halted through repression.

  2. I’ve seen it since the beginning of Reaganomics. It hit home for me by 1984.

  3. Huey Long was right; some things never change. Human nature hasn’t changed since Desiderius Erasmus was ridiculing hypocricy in the sixteenth century.

  4. RepubAnon says:

    Tumbrel rides have also been known to have a salutary effect, if followed by a haircut as administered by Dr. Guillotine’s invention.

  5. RepubAnon says:

    It actually makes perfectly good sense. You see, it’s all about merit-based pay: when profits are up – the CEO earned that massive bonus. When profits are down, one must give the CEO an equally massive bonus “to remain competitive” and to “retain top talent.”

    This argument makes very good sense – to the CEOs, and to those whose salaries depend upon keeping the CEOs happy… it also makes sense to anyone making less than high-6-figure salaries that are still voting for Republicans. I realize that it sounds like a cross between absolute lunacy and highway robbery to the rest of us, but that’s just because we’re jealous of their success or something (according to the CEOs).


  6. BeccaM says:

    Nope. No doubt at all.

    Welcome to the New Feudalism.

  7. nicho says:

    Does anyone doubt this is a worldwide assault on the middle class?

  8. A_nonymoose says:

    The only thing that will stop these people is if a few of them — or a lot of them — are forced to take a long walk up a short scaffold.

  9. Tony Tyner says:

    I actually had my 22 1/2 year position cut by a CEO. He was doing his job. That’s why they get rewarded so much. The Bastards!

© 2021 AMERICAblog Media, LLC. All rights reserved. · Entries RSS