Elon Musk flip-flops on Trump’s Muslim ban

Elon Musk, the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX, is officially all over the place on Trump’s racist Muslim ban.

Earlier this week, Musk tweeted in defense of the ban, suggesting that “the left” was misleading people with their criticism of the ban’s impact.

But now, after a week of growing protests, Musk says he’ll “express objections” to the ban when he meets with Trump on Friday. What objections are those? Who knows.

Musk has joined a number of other business leaders in adding his name to several Trump advisory councils. One is called the Manufacturing Council, and another, the Strategic and Policy Forum. The second is having a meeting at the White House on Friday, February 3.

In the face of growing public criticism of Trump’s Muslim ban, and Trump’s overall erratic presidency, the heads of both Uber and Disney have both pulled out of Friday’s meeting. Uber also quit the policy forum completely. But not Musk.

Sign the petition, and tell Elon Musk that it’s time to stop defending Donald Trump’s racism.

The Muslim ban isn’t the first time Musk was happy to jump in the Trump bandwagon. Just last week, Musk came out in support of Trump’s embattled nominee for Secretary of State, former ExxonMobil CEO Rex Tillerson. Tillerson, like many top Trump advisers, has a troublingly cozy relationship with Russian president Vladimir Putin. Tillerson was confirmed and sworn in this past Wednesday.

While Musk’s Trumpophilia went initially unnoticed, his defense of the Muslim ban, and now his attendance at Friday’s Strategic and Policy Forum, is drawing growing public criticism, which led to the lengthy statement Musk issued on Twitter Thursday night:

Elon Musk Muslim ban statement

Yeah, not so fast. First off, Musk doesn’t explain why the sudden change of heart. Not three days ago, he was defending the Muslim ban and criticizing those who opposed it:

musk-tweet-travel-ban-trump

Yet now, suddenly, we’re to believe that Elon Musk finds the source material to be “more bad” than it was on Monday? How so, exactly? What changed between now and Monday, and what exact concerns is Elon Musk allegedly going to raise with Trump on Friday?

Elon Musk is naive if he doesn’t think his attendance at tomorrow’s meeting, and his membership on the two Trump advisory groups, is anything more than a propaganda coup for Donald Trump. Trump couldn’t care less what Elon Musk or anyone else thinks about policy. Musk is a trophy-CEO, just like all the other trophy heads of state that Trump is collecting in order to feed his own petty insecurities.

And in any case, judging by last week’s support of Tillerson, and this week’s tweet defending the Muslim ban, why should we believe that Elon Musk’s participation doesn’t mean he “agrees” with Trump’s policies. On two critically important policies two weeks in a row, it meant just that.

If Elon Musk isn’t a Trump stooge, and isn’t in fact selling out the hipster-ethos he’s cultivated around Tesla and SpaceX, then let him do what the other CEOs have done. Publicly criticize Trump’s Muslim ban, and then quit these Potemkin village advisory councils all together.

Sign the petition, and tell Elon Musk that it’s time to stop defending Donald Trump’s racism.

red-donateWith the election of Donald Trump, AMERICAblog’s independent journalism and activism is more needed than ever.

Please support our work with a generous donation. (If you prefer PayPal, use this link.) We don’t make much on advertising, we need your support to continue our work. Thanks.

Also, check out our Trump Swag store, where all the proceeds go to supporting our independent journalism at AMERICAblog.

Follow me on Twitter & Facebook:






Follow me on Twitter: @aravosis | @americablog | @americabloggay | Facebook | Instagram | Google+ | LinkedIn. John Aravosis is the Executive Editor of AMERICAblog, which he founded in 2004. He has a joint law degree (JD) and masters in Foreign Service from Georgetown; and has worked in the US Senate, World Bank, Children's Defense Fund, the United Nations Development Programme, and as a stringer for the Economist. He is a frequent TV pundit, having appeared on the O'Reilly Factor, Hardball, World News Tonight, Nightline, AM Joy & Reliable Sources, among others. John lives in New York City, and is the cofounder of TimeToResign.com. Bio, .

Share This Post

  • NotConvinced

    Maybe Elon had a “come to Jesus moment”. It could happen.

  • Badgerite

    For one thing, the ban mentions “honor killings” as a reason for banning people from these 7 countries. We, as a nation, are not really at threat from a rash of Muslim “honor killings”.
    And some of the Muslim majority countries not banned, such a Pakistan, are notorious for “honor killings”. And it isn’t just the wording of the ban that is at issue here. It is the true intent. That is what the law will base its decision on. And that can be determined by the actual impact of the ban on security. And the fact that all those expert and experienced in the area of national security say it will hurt our security more than help it.
    And then, of course, there is Rudy Giuliani who provides actual first hand testimony as to the reason behind the ban. Which appears to be purely political and aimed at banning people based on their religion because that is what was promised during the campaign. This is not a valid, constitutional reason to instigate such a ban. The courts will have to ultimately determine the legal validity of such a ban. But the market place, and consumers, can and will believe their “lying eyes”.

  • Quilla

    Money. And and the cancelled orders for his new toy.

© 2017 AMERICAblog Media, LLC. All rights reserved. · Entries RSS