Utah GOP’s experiment with online voting hits snags

Yesterday, Utah’s Republican Party tried out a system which let registered Republicans in the state caucus online. It crashed and burned.

Would-be caucusers reported being unable to get into the system, receiving multiple error messages, confusing outbound links and in some cases not being able to cast their ballot at all. Moreover, according to the Washington Post, “party officials said about 10,000 of the 40,000 Utahns who applied to vote online were rejected because their IDs couldn’t be verified.”

For some voters who were approved, the PIN they were supposed to receive via email in order to use the system went to their spam folder, meaning they weren’t able to log in even though they were approved.

From the Post:

ipad internet

Internet via Shutterstock.

Utah GOP officials billed the online voting system, which the state paid $150,000 to promote, as a convenience of the future. Busy moms could juggle soccer practice and cooking dinner with voting, and out-of-state missionaries didn’t have to fuss with filing an absentee ballot, they said. Plus it would help alleviate long lines expected at caucus sites. Officials are expecting 15 percent of Utah voters to vote online, according to NPR’s Scott Detrow.

It’s unclear if that 15 percent benchmark was reached, but it’s very clear that many of the people the system was designed to help vote were instead hindered.

To be clear, none of these problems constituted security vulnerabilities highlighted by tech experts during the run-up to the caucus. Rather, they constituted barriers to access that defeated the entire purpose of using an online system. Online voting comes with the promise of breaking down obstacles to ballot access — no standing in line, no snail mail, no driving to and from your polling location. But if the system billed as a massive expansion to ballot access doesn’t actually expand access to the ballot, and if anything creates confusion that results in fewer people casting ballots, then the whole purpose is defeated.

To be clear, the flaws in Utah’s system don’t mean that online voting is itself a bad idea. They do, however, underscore just how difficult it is to pull off — and how far we are from being able to do it successfully on a large scale.

Jon Green graduated from Kenyon College with a B.A. in Political Science and high honors in Political Cognition. He worked as a field organizer for Congressman Tom Perriello in 2010 and a Regional Field Director for President Obama's re-election campaign in 2012. Jon writes on a number of topics, but pays especially close attention to elections, religion and political cognition. Follow him on Twitter at @_Jon_Green, and on Google+. .

Share This Post

  • dcinsider

    I am a big fan of online voting and believe it IS the wave of the future. I credit Utah GOP with giving it a try. If I can bank online, I’m OK voting online. That being said, I personally prefer showing up at the polls, but I’m just a bit nostalgic.

    Of course, the devil is in the details.

  • Alyce Owens

    “my .friend’s mate Is getting 98$. HOURLY. on the internet.”….

    two days ago new Mc.Laren. F1 bought after earning 18,512$,,,this was my previous month’s paycheck ,and-a little over, 17k$ Last month ..3-5 h/r of work a days ..with extra open doors & weekly. paychecks.. it’s realy the easiest work I have ever Do.. I Joined This 7 months ago and now making over 87$, p/h.Learn. More right Hereo!521➤➤➤➤➤ http://GlobalSuperEmploymentVacanciesReportsJobs/GetPaid/98$hourly…. .❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:❖:❦:::::o!521………….

  • Hue-Man

    “To be clear, none of these problems constituted security vulnerabilities…”

    That doesn’t mean that those security vulnerabilities didn’t ALSO occur. I wouldn’t be surprised if there was a non-disclosure agreement which would prevent anyone from talking about security problems they did find.

© 2016 AMERICAblog News. All rights reserved. · Entries RSS