Billionaire Dem donor Steyer tells Obama to stop the Keystone Pipeline

Programming note: I`ll be on Ring of Fire this weekend with Mike Papantonio talking about Keystone. Details here. Listen live link here or click here to find a station near you. Show times: 3pm ET Saturday; 12pm ET Sunday. Tune in if you can — thanks.
________

This is a Keystone pipeline post — there`s rather good news, a billionaire Democratic donor, Tom Steyer, has written the President and told him to oppose the Keystone Pipeline — but I want to frame this as one battle in a small group of critical battles with Obama. It`s important, both tactically and strategically, that we see them as interconnected. So I want to lead with the context. (To jump to just the news about Steyer, click here.)

What are our critical second-term battles with Obama?

I`ve been saying that there are three big second-term battles we have with Obama and his administration. As expressed in this post, the second-term items are:

■ The “Grand Bargain” — a pretend way to solve a pretend problem (the deficit) with a disguised real goal — start the rollback of social insurance programs. (See here at 1:30 and elsewhere in the clip; note, that’s 2006.) Rolling back social insurance is a neoliberal wet dream. Clinton was on that path until a certain blue dress got in the way. The next Clinton will be on that path as well. Obama’s been after benefit cuts since his inauguration.

Oil and gas production — under Obama it`s off the charts, at a mid-term high. Getting Keystone approved is a clear must-have for him. Keystone has been fast-tracked since the beginning, and after a speed-bump in which the environmental movement reared its powerful head and asked for the wrong thing, it’s fast-tracked today. The latest government Keystone study was, in effect, authored by the pipeline’s owner, TransCanada.

■ TPP (TransPacific Partnership) — the latest trade agreement in a gaggle of trade agreements that enshrine capital as the only entity with global travel rights. Every billionaire on the planet will pay both the House and the Senate major money to please-please-please make it so. Obama will eagerly sign if they pass TPP through Congress.

We could win all three battles. On the first, `Grand Bargain` benefit cuts, we`ve been winning all along, thanks to you, and thanks to every vulnerable Congressional Democrat and Republican (which isn`t all of them, but it`s enough). No one in the country but the rich — and the D`s and R`s who serve them — want social programs cut. And the news today is that we might have won because the corp-friendly and powerful Dem think-tank CAP has just reversed itself. Time to stop grand-bargaining, they now say. Obama`s going to have to go it alone.

`Keystone

On the second, Keystone, it looks like a fight, but the Force is truly with us. Every day, more and more people are seeing this as a life-on-the-planet crossroads — because it is. If your child was born today and lives to 90 years old, she or he could live in a planet-cooked +7°C world. No fooling.

According to James Hansen`s recent work, the earth hasn`t seen +1°C since before the Pliocene, over 5 million years ago, way before man`s time began. And that could be a cast-in-stone outcome in the next 5–10 years. (More on Hansen`s new work in a future post.)

On the third, TPP, I`ll have more soon as well, including suggested framing and tactics to stop it.

All three battles are critical enough that we need to put our bodies in the gears of the machine to win them. This is about how the Keystone battle is shaping up.

The battle over Keystone is heating up

There`s been action on the Keystone front in just the last few weeks, all of it good for us. Even the Sierra Club signed on, the first such campaign in the club`s history.

Then Obama`s rebranded campaign operation, OFA, tried to roll out the `Obama cares about the climate` message and got challenged by real Obama voters about Keystone. Looks like, on Keystone, that Obama voters will not be easily rolled, and the fight is turning public.

Nothing OFA does, short of joining the anti-Keystone battle, will make it look like the good guys. And if OFA looks bad, Obama looks bad … because (shh) OFA is Obama (but keep it under your hat).

And just days ago, strong Obama-loyalist Van Jones came out hard against Obama and the pipeline. According to Jones, if it`s such a legacy item `he should call it the `Obama Tar Sands Pipeline` and stand there for the ribbon-cutting.` Strong indeed. And I`m willing to bet that Jones will be one of those chained to the White House fence; he sounds like he means it.

Which brings us to this week. Note that a few links above, where I said that Obama and OFA are getting challenged by Obama voters, I inserted this (new emphasis below):

Obama Hints at Approval of Keystone XL Pipeline at SF Fundraiser, Blames Middle Class Priorities

While President Obama didn’t address the Keystone XL Pipeline directly at a San Francisco fundraiser on Wednesday, he did give a hint that political reality – or his perception of it — will compel him to approve the final portions of it.

At the home of a pro-green, anti Keystone XL Pipeline billionaire, Obama set up an excuse for approval:

He said, “The politics of this are tough.” …

Obama’s remarks came at the home of billionaire Tom Steyer, a major supporter of green energy and climate initiatives who is planning to play an active role in the 2014 elections.

Keep Steyer in mind — he`s already not a fan of Keystone. In April, The Hill profiled him this way:

A California billionaire is pledging to spend as much of his fortune as necessary to make climate change “the defining issue of our generation.”

Tom Steyer, who made his riches as a hedge fund manager, told The Hill on Tuesday that he wants to make climate change a campaign issue for years to come and Democratic support for environmental protections as widespread as support for gay marriage and immigration reform.

The goal here is not to win. The goal here is to destroy these people. We want a smashing victory,” Steyer said of candidates he judges to be on the wrong side of the climate change debate.

Steyer turned up in The Hill because of the dinner you just read about — `a $32,500-per-person fundraiser with President Obama.` This isn`t a small-time fundraiser; Steyer is a hedge-fund king worth over a billion dollars who hosted a meet-Obama dinner at his home, a dinner costing more per-plate than 30% of the country makes in a year.

Dem billionaire challenges Obama on Keystone

And now the news. Like some of us, the above-mentioned billionaire Tom Steyer recently learned that the province of British Columbia just said No to a Keystone-like pipeline from Alberta to the Pacific Coast …

British Columbia rejects tar sands pipeline proposal that suggests “doing nothing” after oil spill

… In its final submission Friday to the federally-appointed Northern Gateway Pipeline Joint Review Panel, the province states that it cannot support the Enbridge Northern Gateway project because the company “has been unable to address British Columbians’ environmental concerns.”

… and he`s acting on it. The British Columbia news hasn`t made a splash in the U.S. yet — think the corp-owned media may be in the tank for Keystone? — but it hit Steyer like a rock.

Here`s Steyer letter to Barack Obama, as quoted from DownWithTyranny, starting with Howie Klein`s introduction (my emphasis in both quotes):

As we`ve mentioned before, San Francisco billionaire Tom Steyer, `til now a dependable contributor to garden variety, Establishment Democrats, is deadly serious about saving the planet from environmental mayhem at the hands of corporate polluters, particularly, right now, the Keystone XL Pipeline. This week he warned Obama that there are no grounds whatsoever to approve the pipeline.

Now Tom Steyer`s letter, in full:

Dear Mr. President,

With Friday`s announcement that the Canadian provincial government of British Columbia opposes the transportation of tar sands oil over their lands, the last of the arguments for the development of the Keystone Pipeline has collapsed.

It has been my belief all along that your Administration was not going to approve the Keystone Pipeline because it simply made no sense on the policy merits to allow a pipeline that would enable massive greenhouse emissions, do almost nothing for our economy and slow our own move to research-based advanced energy independence that will generate hundreds of thousands of American jobs. Now this announcement by British Columbia, coupled with the other information that has come out since the review of the project began, means the controversy should be over.

Over the last year, each of the policy arguments for the pipeline has cratered.

First fell the argument that the pipeline would support oil independence. The U.S. is now an exporter of oil, and the Keystone oil will be piped across the Midwest down to the Gulf of Mexico where it will then be shipped as a cheap source of energy to our economic competitors in Asia, including China. In fact, TransCanada, the company building the pipeline, refused to support guarantees that the Keystone oil would not be used for foreign export when asked by Congressman Ed Markey (D-MA) during congressional testimony in December 2011.

Second toppled the argument that the pipeline is good for the U.S. economy. The pipeline will generate profits, but profits overwhelmingly for foreign companies. The project will generate as much as $3.9 billion in additional revenue for foreign oil companies. Jobs, of course, are critical, but for the billions that the American people will generate for foreign oil companies, we will only get 35 permanent jobs in return. In fact, it appears that among the few Americans who would actually financially benefit from the building of the pipeline are the Koch Brothers (they have already been storing a toxic byproduct of Canadian tar sands oil at a location in Detroit, and in Canadian regulatory filings one of their subsidiaries declared that it had a “direct and substantial interest” in the construction of Keystone).

And now, the argument that the tar sands oil was going to be delivered across Canada if the U.S. pipeline was not permitted has been demolished. The contractor hired by the State Department to prepare its Keystone XL environmental impact review is reportedly under investigation for an alleged conflict of interest. Based on that contractor’s report, the State Department declared that there will be no significant greenhouse gas emissions from Keystone because the oil would be exported by other means if the pipeline were not approved. That argument was always a flimsy rationalization, but it has now been completely undermined by the decision of British Columbia to oppose a route through that province. This decision shows that our Environmental Protection Agency was right all along: Transporting tar sands from Canada through the Keystone Pipeline will significantly increase greenhouse gas emissions.

Given that none of the chief arguments being put forth by supporters of the pipeline remain standing, NextGen Action is going to be working with our friends and allies who are opposed to the development of Keystone XL to intensify our efforts in communicating what is the right policy choice to your Administration. On June 20, in Washington D.C. we will announce a campaign that will specifically focus on communicating to those Americans across the country that supported your re-election in 2012.

Respectfully,

Tom Steyer

I don`t know where he got this idea:

It has been my belief all along that your Administration was not going to approve the Keystone Pipeline because it simply made no sense on the policy merits…

But his eyes are open now. I`m keeping Mr. Steyer and NextGen Action on our radar. I hope you`ll keep it on yours. As I said, this is winnable. Many many people get what`s at stake.

GP

To follow or send links: @Gaius_Publius


Gaius Publius is a professional writer living on the West Coast of the United States. Click here for more. Follow him on Twitter @Gaius_Publius and Facebook.

Share This Post

  • Obaaaaaaaama sheep get sheared

    Billlary would sell her soul to Satan for her and Slick Willy to be in the White house…what a phoney loving couple they are lol….How would you like to be her enemy after seeing what she does to her friends….let them get butchered in Benghazi so the liar and thief can say the terrorist are on the runand the war on terrorism is over.I have never seen such stupid gullible people as the dummycrats are lol…feel duped yet ???????

  • Obaaaaaaaama sheep get sheared

    More transparency from the hopey / changey liar and thief who don’t give a rats arse about us.Feel duped yet dummycrats ???????????

  • Sri

    Ha! A democratic leaning billionaire demanding a policy – well that is love of the world, a republican leaning billionaire demanding a policy, well that is Plutocracy or trying to buy democracy… simply amazing.

  • mpeasee

    Its good to get some positive news about the anti-Keystone development…I hope money speech helps!

  • Sal Solomon

    GP, we all owe you and your efforts a lot. If it were not for your refreshing articles, I would have stopped coming to Americablog.com long time ago.

  • Naja pallida

    At this point, I honestly have no idea what to think. The Democratic side of the field looks pretty devoid of anyone I would have any interest in supporting. But I guess, it is still pretty early.

  • Indigo

    Whom do you prefer?

  • Indigo

    I was for Hillary before I was against her and then I was for Hillary again and now I don’t have a preference. Suggestions? (Don’t say Ron Paul! ;-)

  • Kim_Kaufman

    re grand bargain – thank you, Gaius, for your help and everyone else’s. It got very noisy in his district and I know it got all the way up to Waxman. It became clear to him it was a vote he couldn’t take. A couple of heavy hitters like him telling leadership he can’t do it and well, next thing you know, the WH sends out a press release from CAP. :)

  • Whitewitch

    No worries Mod – I was amused really. Peace!

  • http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bcrEqIpi6sg Moderator4

    Whitewitch, this is coming from Disqus, not this website. You may contact Disqus at disqus.com.

  • JPlattim1933

    There is an ad covering the other side of this box. Why hasn’t this
    blog worked properly for about two months when the problem was known
    about a month ago?­ ­http://mybestfriendmakes65dollarsper&#46qr&#46net/kkEj

  • lynchie

    refers to Clinton

  • lynchie

    He already has. You ain’t seen nothing yet.

  • Whitewitch

    Sorry – Off Topic:

    OH oh – it shows who up-votes now – but not who down-votes…so down voting must be a “protected” sport!.

  • emjayay

    Huh?

  • Buford2k11

    From what I have been seeing that is just as disturbing, is “eminent domain”…there seems to be a sort of blurring of the “intent” of eminent domain…I don’t think it was meant for the private sector to force their will upon the little guy…this seems to be a goal of the private sector, to condemn and build what they want, where they want, and when they want…

  • Naja pallida

    I don’t have much faith in Hillary being The One… and I’m still not convinced she’s even going to run.

  • Naja pallida

    Well, two problems with that.

    One, the ruling party in the Canadian government right now is a hard-right wing Bush-wannabe one. Determined to give away all Canada’s natural resources at rock bottom prices, all in the name of the ‘free market’. So they have no interest in preventing their oil companies from pushing for anything. Whether that is likely to change in the next election, who knows. Canadian politics has been so flaky for the last decade.

    Two, TransCanada, while ostensibly a Canadian corporation, like all large oil companies, is a multi-national company. It’s traded on the New York Stock Exchange as well as the Toronto Stock Exchange. And while founded and headquartered in Canada, like other large companies, the only interest they really have in their specific location is that is where the oil happens to be. If they could headquarter in Dubai to avoid some particular law they didn’t like, they would in a heartbeat. Thankfully Canada is a little more sensible about things like that than the US is.

    Really, our only saving grace thus far has been provincial governments. Specifically that British Columbia tends to lean liberal, and has a strong environmental movement. But the pipeline from Alberta to the Great Lakes states is still in full operation. Tar sands oil is still going to market, and will continue to do so unabated.

  • http://adgitadiaries.com/ karmanot

    “Maybe Hillary isn’t The One after all?” Good god I hope not, we’ll have to fight that one tooth and nail.

  • http://www.rebeccamorn.com/mind BeccaM

    Maybe one place to apply pressure is the Canadian government. Lobby them to please not let their oil company take advantage of American short-sightedness and corporate corruption. For the sake of the planet itself.

  • http://www.rebeccamorn.com/mind BeccaM

    It’s pretty easy to see why Obama would approve of and support such a project: Campaign donations. And after-office rewards.

    In this Citizens United era and secret Super PACs, the money-gushers are essentially unlimited. I don’t doubt that behind to push to approve the toxic goo pipeline is a whole lot of Big Oil money flowing into DNC coffers.

    Corporate money is behind everything appalling that’s been coming out of this Administration. Free Trade deals. H1-B expansion disguised as immigration reform. PPACA. Eroding social welfare programs. Support for privatizing our schools. Anti-union measures.

    Obama is a young man with two young daughters. He’ll soon be securing his billionaire legacy.

  • Indigo

    That makes sense. Let’s meet the new boss, just like the old boss. Maybe Hillary isn’t The One after all?

  • Naja pallida

    The problem is, even if Obama is dragged kicking and screaming over the line (like with every sensible policy) and does do something to stop it, unless Congress passes something explicitly banning it or anything like it, the second the Republicans are in control again, it will be right back on the table. Thus far, it seems he is content to just kick the can down the road and let the next President make the real decision on it.

  • lynchie

    you forgot serial adulterer.

  • Reasor

    This is essentially it. With reelection behind him, Obama now has his post-Presidential livelihood to think about.

  • GaiusPublius

    I think you have to conclude that both parties are in the pocket of Big Oil, Myrddin. Because on the merits, you’re exactly right.

    These days I think of Obama as just another crass politician with a Memorial Library to build who wants what Bill Clinton now has, international “acclaim,” $80 million and counting, and a family that’s been levered into the lower reaches of the upper class.

    Not a bad turn-out for a dope-smoker from Oahu, at least in his mind.

    GP

  • MyrddinWilt

    I can’t see why Obama would want to approve a project that would transport toxic sludge across the US to supply China with cheap oil.

    The GOP motive is easy, the pipeline backers bought them off.

    Refusing the application allows the Keystone owners to appeal. So it gets held up indefinitely with no decision.

  • Indigo

    Until the pipeline is actually stopped, l’ll reserve judgment but that could be a positive development.

  • emjayay

    Obama, like all national politicians, is afraid of not jus oftheews grabbing ox Ns uprtng arrigt wing,ut ug business/big money, even if he is philoophically on th side f the environment This Steyer guy is doing two services: perhaps impressing Obama abi wimoneyon the envionmental sie
    and succinctly explaining some excnt poliical arguements that will work (othr thn the baa derangement/mindlessly supporting big business butnot bi gvernment mania of the right wing)

  • emjayay

    There is an ad covering the other side of this box. Why hasn’t this blog worked properly for about two months when the problem was known about a month ago?

© 2014 AMERICAblog News. All rights reserved. · Entries RSS