Cat beats stockbrokers in picking best stocks for 2012

Move over banksters, it’s time for catsters.  A cat just beat a group of professional stockbrokers in picking the best stocks for the year.

Basically, the Observer newspaper asked some middle/high school students, some professional stockbrokers, and a cat, to pick £5,000 worth of stocks ($7,918) and see how they fare after one year.

The cat won.

After one year, the cat ended up with £5,542.60, compared to the stockbrokers’ £5,176.60.  No word on how the students did, but it sounds from the article like they ended up last.

And I love how they got the cat to pick its stocks. From the Guardian:

Cat 1% banker wall street

Catster via Shutterstock

While the professionals used their decades of investment knowledge and traditional stock-picking methods, the cat selected stocks by throwing his favourite toy mouse on a grid of numbers allocated to different companies.

A similar experiment was done in 1988 with hypothetical monkeys, played by Wall Street Journal staffers throwing darts at a wall in order to pick stocks.  While the professionals beat the dart-monkey, it wasn’t by a ton.  Investor Home describes the results:

sushi cat

My Parisian broker, Sushi, asleep
after a long day of trading pigeons.

On October 7, 1998 the Journal presented the results of the 100th dartboard contest. So who won the most contests and by how much? The pros won 61 of the 100 contests versus the darts. That’s better than the 50% that would be expected in an efficient market. On the other hand, the pros losing 39% of the time to a bunch of darts certainly could be viewed as somewhat of an embarrassment for the pros. Additionally, the performance of the pros versus the Dow Jones Industrial Average was less impressive. The pros barely edged the DJIA by a margin of 51 to 49 contests. In other words, simply investing passively in the Dow, an investor would have beaten the picks of the pros in roughly half the contests (that is, without even considering transactions costs or taxes for taxable investors).

The pro’s picks look more impressive when the actual returns of their stocks are compared with the dartboard and DJIA returns. The pros average gain was 10.8% versus 4.5% for the darts and 6.8% for the DJIA.

The clear lesson here is that cats come before brokers, which come before monkeys.

But any cat owner could have told you that.


Follow me on Twitter: @aravosis | @americablog | @americabloggay | Facebook | Google+ | LinkedIn. John Aravosis is the editor of AMERICAblog, which he founded in 2004. He has a joint law degree (JD) and masters in Foreign Service from Georgetown (1989); and worked in the US Senate, World Bank, Children's Defense Fund, and as a stringer for the Economist. Frequent TV pundit: O'Reilly Factor, Hardball, World News Tonight, Nightline & Reliable Sources. Bio, .

Share This Post

  • http://adgitadiaries.com/ karmanot

    True, Cats have staff. ” “Dogs come when they’re called; cats take a message and get back to you later.” Mary Bly

  • http://adgitadiaries.com/ karmanot

    This kittah is no fool. she’s read the Simpson/Bowels report and is shorting dog kibble.

  • http://twitter.com/bigknowzz Leon

    It is overly simplistic to look at the return in isolation. I could buy General Motors and make 10%, while another person could buy a high risk biotech stock and return 20%. The higher return is payment for higher risk. It is more important to look at the returns on a risk adjusted basis.

  • NCMan

    It’s an amusing little game. But, I don’t see how the different methods are comparable. Were the professionals limited to picking from the same companies that the cats had in their grid of numbers? Or could the pros pick any company available on the market while the cats were limited to a limited number of companies?

  • perljammer

    Cats are extremely low-maintenance animals, and are reliable sources of entertainment and amusement. And, they have absolutely mastered the art of taking a person right to the edge with displays of arrogance, and then reeling him back in with cuteness.

  • Mike_in_the_Tundra

    It amazes me that the servants are willing to work for an occasional purr and a rub against the leg.

  • Naja pallida

    Just confirms what I’ve long believed. The stock market is little more than a crap shoot. Sometimes you win, sometimes you lose, the house always wins.

  • milli2

    Ha Ha. Proof that cats rule the world. Well, my world at least.

  • S1AMER

    Cats are far smarter than humans: The typical house cat knows instinctively how to live very well — with servants, no less! — for very little labor. Q.E.D.

© 2014 AMERICAblog News. All rights reserved. · Entries RSS