UK tries again to target banker pay

Having real votes and not the ridiculous non-binding votes that Obama supported is better, but still not the answer. Of course, it’s all a bit off when you think that the UK is looking at their own quantitative easing program which would only stuff more cash into the wallets of the bankers. Cutting the banks off from their free rides and having real consequences for failure makes a lot more sense. The Guardian:

As David Cameron set out proposals to give shareholders a binding vote on executive pay deals, data compiled by a leading advisory body, Pensions & Investment Research Consultants (Pirc), showed how few remuneration votes had more than 50% of votes cast against them since investors were granted an advisory vote in 2003. “We would be in favour of exploring a binding vote on pay, but the problem at the moment is that too few shareholders are willing to use the rights they have, as demonstrated by the low number of remuneration reports that have been voted down,” a Pirc spokesman said. Increasing numbers of shares in companies listed on the stock market are no longer owned by traditional institutional investors – such as pension funds – but by hedge funds and other overseas investors, which makes it more difficult to galvanise rebellions against pay deals.

An American in Paris, France. BA in History & Political Science from Ohio State. Provided consulting services to US software startups, launching new business overseas that have both IPO’d and sold to well-known global software companies. Currently launching a new cloud-based startup. Full bio here.

Share This Post

© 2019 AMERICAblog Media, LLC. All rights reserved. · Entries RSS