Did ballot changes in NH give Hillary 3% points more?

A Stanford professor says changes in the way New Hampshire printed their ballots may have given Hillary 3% more of the vote and that this explains why the results were so unexpected yesterday. I do have to say that I’m getting really tired of reading about how screwed up our elections are. It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to read this article and see that the guy could very well have a point – why not just randomize everything?

Follow me on Twitter: @aravosis | @americablog | @americabloggay | Facebook | Instagram | Google+ | LinkedIn. John Aravosis is the Executive Editor of AMERICAblog, which he founded in 2004. He has a joint law degree (JD) and masters in Foreign Service from Georgetown; and has worked in the US Senate, World Bank, Children's Defense Fund, the United Nations Development Programme, and as a stringer for the Economist. He is a frequent TV pundit, having appeared on the O'Reilly Factor, Hardball, World News Tonight, Nightline, AM Joy & Reliable Sources, among others. John lives in Washington, DC. .

Share This Post

© 2017 AMERICAblog Media, LLC. All rights reserved. · Entries RSS